of a house), or where its position is in respect of this ‘of’ (e.g. It seems that while the ‘threshold’ must be given a definitional limit or negation by which to circumscribe it off from other images or terms, at the same time it seems that one cannot properly make sense of the ‘threshold’ if one is not in some conceptual respect already noticing what is beyond the threshold’s limit - both in reference to what the threshold is the threshold of (e.g. But if ‘land’ is included in the definition of the threshold, one then has an accompanying image of a certain type of land, its color, or something else. Yet consequent upon this first image (or perhaps lying next to it, as an unnoticed part thereof), a second image of the surrounding boundaries outside of the threshold inevitably follows, an image such as the land bordering the house. the threshold as piece of material located at a fixed place at the point of entrance to a house or room. The first of these images is of the term defined, i.e. if the threshold is characterized by its position, (.) 1 “And the same is true in the other cases, e.g.Enfin, il sera montré comment Hegel a tenté de prendre ces concepts-seuils chez Aristote pour leur donner une fonction méthodologique pour la pensée elle-même ainsi que pour la détermination philosophique des catégories de l’être. Il s’applique à démontrer à travers un examen des catégories d’Aristote et de la notion de différence, du mouvement et de la signification de la copule, que la pensée d’Aristote est structurée par des concepts-seuils non-binaires qui sont essentiels à son système philosophique. Ce texte explore le fait que la notion hégélienne de la négation remonte aux idées d’Aristote au sujet de la bonne formulation d’une définition ainsi que ses idées sur les opposés et la connexion entre eux à travers un troisième terme. Hegel a décrit ce phénomène du mouvement de la définition d’un concept vers les termes qui l’accompagnent comme la détermination d’un concept à partir de sa « négation » et a considéré cette méthode comme fondamentale à toute approche philosophique. Finally, we will show how Hegel attempted to take these essentially structural threshold concepts in Aristotle and turn their function into a methodology for both thought itself as well as the philosophical determination of the categories of being.Ĭe qui est particulier à l’idée de seuil c’est que c’est sa propre définition de générer un contour conceptuel qui va vers un autre champ d’exploration, même si ces images de contour semblent devoir être exclues de sa définition. Through a close examination of the problem of Aristotle’s categories, along with Aristotle’s description of the differentiae, movement, and the meaning of the copula, we can demonstrate that Aristotle’s thinking is at core structured by non-binary ‘threshold concepts’ which are essential to his philosophical system. However, what is not usually noted is that Hegel’s notion of negation is both crucially related to Aristotle’s thought on how definitions are formulated, as well as his postulations about opposites and their connection through a third substantial thing. Hegel described this phenomenon of the movement from a concept’s definition to its accompanying terms as the determination of a concept through ‘negation’, and viewed such a method as central to philosophical insight. What is unique to the idea of a threshold is that it is a threshold’s proper definition to generate or signal an inevitable accompanying image of a surrounding boundary or a further field of exploration, even though these accompanying terms or images seem like they should be excluded from its definition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |